Ya, the first one seems more dynamic, like if it was moving and the blur was
motion blur.
Neverthless, when I posted a similar image on another art forum, people said
that there was way too much blur, they thought I missed the "shot" (or
render...) : they said "it's really bad dof (depth of field) ".
So, I really don't know what to choose and what are the criterias for a good
macro photo/render.

Louis


web.3fddfc079be596df606ff9980@news.povray.org...
> I dunno... the first had a much more artistic and photo-like feel.  The
> second might be more photo-realistic, but it's lacking some of the
> impression or mystique of the first.
>
> Frank
>

Post a reply to this message