Thorsten Froehlich wrote:

> Anybody who still uses raw pointers in C++ deserves to be shot!
> 
If you mean "raw pointer" = "void pointer", then I completely agree. 

Otherwise, I strongly object. 
(Because you then probably would have to shoot me -- with several 
automatic guns in parallel :p)

Pointers are the most useful thing in C and you cannot get around 
them in C++ if you want to keep fast performance. 
All that guided stuff I've heared yet is both slow & fat. 

Or do you see an alternative?

Wolfgang

Post a reply to this message