Thorsten Froehlich wrote:

>>Can you tell what are/were the reasons for deciding to rewrite the whole
>>POV-Ray in C++? Performance wise I think it doesn't mean much nowadays,
>>but do you think OO suites POV-Ray better than plain ol' procedural C?
>>It will be a huge task but do you think it will pay the effort as easier
>>code maintenance and further development?
>  
> I outlined the answers to your questions in the second half of the last
> paragraph of my message.

Indeed, I hadn't read that. You wrote: "a fast, lean and extraordinary 
stable piece of software". But doesn't Pov-Ray allready meet these 
goals? Or is this simply about it being _easier_ to achieve those goals 
with C++ than with C? (My knowledge of C++ is _very_ limited). Just curious.

Severi S.

Post a reply to this message