I agree that it would make more sense to use a simple flat mesh.

Nico

Mael wrote:
> Using such a box is quite strange IMHO (but there might be a reason for it
> ?)..
> Try replacing it with a simple mesh with two triangles, something like
> 
>  mesh {
>      triangle { <0,0,0>, <1,0,0>, <1,1,0> }
>      triangle { <0,0,0>, <0,1,0>, <1,1,0> }
> 
> (not tested)
> 
> M
> 
>

Post a reply to this message