"Thorsten Froehlich" <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:

>In article <3fd5b6d3.1022837913@news.povray.org> , kai### [at] siemenscom 
>(Andreas Kaiser) wrote:
>
>> cannot use it directly as it's a C++-ified version,
>
>BTW, also your work sounds very interesting and nice, it has zero chance of
>making it into an official POV-Ray if it does not follow the current code.
>It is absolutely pointless to simply convert the current code to C++ classes
>as it will only change the syntax and introduce many new bugs, but just
>cannot fix any of the design problems.
>

It may be absolutely pointless from your point of view. When i started
my intention was just to learn C++ and to understand the inner working
of POV-Ray.
From my point of view this worked very well.

Andreas

Post a reply to this message