> Actually, I read the book a while back, so that was neat to actually 'see'
it.
That's why I rendered it, back in '92.
I found out some of the things they described can't be seen as in the book,
other things worked out..
It's an interesting problem of scale.
Back then, I rendered a 360 frame "fly-through" which would have been at
something like warp-9, but it took a week on my 386-33
