The number wasn't significant.  I simply testing various Z axis rotation
sizes and by trial and error (mostly error) ended up on that number.

"Samuel Benge" <sbe### [at] hotmailcom> wrote in message
news:3F8### [at] hotmailcom...
> I'm unschooled in the field of traditional trigonomentry usage.... where
> did you get the number 4.725?
>
> None wrote:
>
> > I think Reduce should simply be set to something like:
> >
> > #declare Reduce = X * tan(radians(4.725));
> >
>
>
> -- 
> Samuel Benge
>
> stb### [at] hotmailcom
>

Post a reply to this message