John VanSickle wrote:
> Rune wrote:
>>
>> the geometry of the shape was not at all clear.
>
> This last is not necessarily a bad thing.

Maybe not nessesarily. But I didn't like it. The new animation is much
easier for the eye I think.

> The only flaw I noted in the old anim--absent
> from the new!--is that there was a slight
> discontinuity from not enough depth in recursion.

Yes, indeed. I upped it by two levels in this one to avoid that problem.
Actually recursion is a wrong term here, as the recursion level of the
menger sponge is unchanged. (For an explanation, see my reply to Tim
Nikias in the post with the first version of the animation. Or look at
the source code.)

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
rune|vision:  http://runevision.com **updated Sep 28**
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk

Post a reply to this message