|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
My project is actually to make 3D renderings from GPS data, so I
necessarily will have a large set of datapoints.. So what I need is a
refined algorithm. I set up my program to test all possible triangles
against Delaunay's criteria. If I could mathematically exclude some of
those triangles it would make a huge difference in running time. Even if I
don't find a better algorithm in that sense, there are some other
improvements I can make... fewer variables, eliminate duplicate
calculations. Shall see, shall see.
Nice looking sig-macro you have there.
RetroJ
"Warp" <war### [at] tag povray org> wrote in message
news:3f47f9b2@news.povray.org...
> RetroJ <jjf### [at] earthlink net> wrote:
> > It runs in O(n^4) time
>
> So forget using any larger amount of points?-)
>
> --
> #macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb
M()}}
> N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
> N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}// -
Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |