|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Christopher James Huff wrote:
> Was I wrong in thinking there were people interested in this?
>
> It's odd, there've been other threads about improving the blob object,
> exponential blobs, etc. But now that there's an actual working patch
> fixing several of these problems, there's not even a hint of interest?
>
Well, I was actually waiting for someone to come up with a better
blob because each time I model some blob object, I was unhappy with
these somewhat ugly lines caused by the linear falloff function.
I was happy when I read that you released you patch finally but
after seeing that I'd have to download more than 1Mb with my
slow modem, I decided to wait for the next MegaPov version...
So really, there _are_ people who are interested in the blob2
and if it is faster than isosurface, I'd apreciate that much because
rendering time is an issue for animations.
Regards,
Wolfgang
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |