> Can we use it in IMP?

Sure, why not? For me it's all about the "old issue":
credit where credit is due. :-)

Come to think about it, I see why this particle-
system might be better suited than a I/O one:
there's no dependancy on earlier frames. It has
a pretty high parsing load, but I've found that
for animations where no object-interaction is
required, the system is sufficient and especially
suited for distributed rendering...

It IS a little complicated to handle, but I plan
on creating a little Insert-Menu for it, to ease
the usage, and rename variables to more
intuitive names...

And it isn't finished yet, so that may take some
time...

But we POVers are patient, aren't we? ;-)

-- 
Tim Nikias v2.0
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights

>
> >
> > Anyways, I'm pretty happy to have it back, though
> > I don't plan to go on with the development. I've begun
> > completing the code and erasing the redundant
> > parts, and hope to have a stable and running version
> > before I leave for my vacation...
> >
>
> Can we use it in IMP?
>
>
> -- 
> Tom
> _________________________________
> The Internet Movie Project
> http://www.imp.org/


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.501 / Virus Database: 299 - Release Date: 14.07.2003

Post a reply to this message