|
|
"Mack Tuesday" <mailbjl@yahoo> wrote in message
news:web.3ef779deb30c05f98c62a7cb0@news.povray.org...
> Tek wrote:
> >"gonzo" <rgo### [at] lansetcom> wrote in message
> >news:web.3ef74c5eb30c05f9a0c272b50[at]news.povray.org...
> >> Rock texture is much better!
> >
> >Woohoo! at last somebody noticed :)
>
> I noticed too. I thought the older one had too many blemishes.
Yeah, it was a bit flat too. Though in the meantime I tried a couple of
completely different textures based on some image maps I've got, and it wasn't
until I compared them to the old version that I realised they looked worse! That
wasted a few hours, but at least I got something good eventually.
> I agree about this. Perhaps you could put a drink on the armrest of the
> chair.
> Yeah, and put the parasol in that!
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
>
> >> The objects do change the whole scale and
> >> perspective... hmmm... the parasol doesn't fit, but chair looks good.
>
> I agree about this. Perhaps you could put a drink on the armrest of the
> chair.
> Yeah, and put the parasol in that!
>
> >I've been trying to think of something to do with more fractals, the best I
> >could come up with was some fractal clouds but they would look out of place.
I
> >don't want more of this kind of fractal, because I feel it works better being
> >so out of place.
>
> I agree.
>
> This is turning out to be a very exciting piece! An excellent, simple idea
> that I wish I had thought of myself, that I probably wouldn't have realized
> as beautifully as you have. Keep up the good work!
>
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|