I don't know why I didn't say this too, probably because I thought you would
already know what's needed: if you use 'union' around the macro statement
(more precisely, it's contents, so the union is part of the macro) then you
can do an 'object {macro(here)}' so it can still be worked with further,
after all is done. Instead of like I was saying before, which was to union
the macro call or leaving it unencapsulated.

Idea is... a 'while' loop should be considered for 'union' (or merge, or
whatever CSG you have in mind) to collect it into a single entity, except
when you intentionally want it ungrouped.

Bob H.

Post a reply to this message