> I am quite familiar with the thread & message forum mentioned.  And yes,
> there have been quite a few other non-pov entries which have pulled off
the
> first place.  As for human bias, I agree there is some in the contest.
But
> one thing that's worse, imho, is those voters who only take a 5 to 10
> second max look at each image before entering their vote then rushing
> along.
> I like to sit back and take a good look, seeing items that the artist
spent
> time on but are harder to see at first glance, etc.
>
That's a good point.  Each new round, I generally quickly look at all of the
images and think "Wow! Some of these are the best ever!" or the opposite of
that.  But upon closer inspection of the images, I generally find missing
details or more details than I had seen the first time.

-- 
Slash

Post a reply to this message