Very nice tool. And I was thinking negative emission would be the same 
as absorption... tsssss ;-)

The order is quite nice too, with the "symmetries" well chosen. I'll 
suggest another order which might be easier to read (or might not): 
starting from 12 o'clock and going clockwise, I'd go
  0, 0, 0
  0, 0,.5
  0,.5, 0
.5, 0, 0
.5,.5, 0
.5, 0,.5
  0,.5,.5
.5,.5,.5
...
(if I understood correctly, symmetries will take care of the rest.)

To improve readability, you might carve small S, E, A letters in the 
spheres or use letters directly. Other ideas, which are rather personal 
taste, include using white/gray/black instead of green/gray/red and 
keeping the spheres horizontal everywhere, always in the same order (SEA).

I do not fully understand the setting. Is the the wheel of constant 
depth and are the media of uniform densities? How is the light located? 
Is the wheel in front of (over) the spheres? Where do the glows come? Is 
there media outside the wheel?


Povingly,

Philippe

Post a reply to this message