|
 |
Yeah I checked that before resizing one of my entries a while ago, and no-one
complained. Okay you can argue that resizing it is post-processing, but there
are some 3D rendering systems that acheive anti-aliasing by simply rendering to
a larger image then resizing it down.
--
Tek
http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
"Slashdolt" <jer### [at] questsoftware com> wrote in message
news:3eb18ce7$1@news.povray.org...
> > * home.jpg
> 3 images, not one render, sounds like violation.
>
> > * 3dcomwat.jpg
> Sounds like they admit violating the rules by adding people via photoshop.
> The people don't look 3D, so that's probably the case.
>
> > * m_fairyt.jpg and jg_w3way.jpg
> I must disagree with you here and quote the FAQ (yes, I'm FAQ-happy today
> indeed).
> "[1.1.14] Is it legal to resize my image after it is rendered?
> Yes, it is. Be careful doing it, though--unless done correctly, resizing can
> often add unwanted visual artifacts to an image. "
> and
> "[1.1.11] Exactly what do you mean by "post-processing"?
> That means running any image-manipulation program on the image after it is
> rendered. Paint programs, photo manipulation programs, and the like are
> generally not allowed, except for a few explicit exceptions. We want the
> image to be the output of a renderer, not a human or special-effects
> program. One guideline that has been mentioned is that any process which
> affects every pixel in the image is usually okay, but that's not a hard and
> fast rule--it's just used to encompass gamma correction, resizing,
> conversion to JPEG format, and so forth, all of which are legal. Another
> guideline is, don't do anything to the image that you wouldn't be prepared
> to do for every frame of a 30-minute animation."
>
> --
> Slash
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
