|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
No, I tried radiosity, and there's not a lot of color.
No differences.
Here's a 1280 x 1024 version, for those how asked
for it.
Best,
S.
--
Steven Pigeon, Ph. D.
pig### [at] iro umontreal ca
"Michael Goldshteyn" <mgo### [at] n-o-s-p-a-m-earthlink net> wrote in
message news:3e71068e$1@news.povray.org...
> I think some radiosity would make this perfect! Not sure what parameters,
> though...
>
> "Steven Pigeon" <pig### [at] iro umontreal ca> wrote in message
> news:3e6fde08@news.povray.org...
> > Another sparkley
> >
> > Originally rendered at 1280 x 768,
> >
> > Total Time: 448 hours 39 minutes 27.0 seconds (1615167 seconds)
> >
> > Quite a while... on an Athlon 1.7GHz machine. Used very
> > small memory (like, ~5 M)
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > S.
> >
> > --
> > Steven Pigeon, Ph. D.
> > pig### [at] iro umontreal ca
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'Growth_03.png' (279 KB)
Preview of image 'Growth_03.png'
![Growth_03.png](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3C3e71261e%40news.povray.org%3E/Growth_03.png?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |