|
 |
"Greg M. Johnson" <gregj:-)56590@ao:-)l.com> wrote in message
news:3e2b19a8$1@news.povray.org...
> "argus" <arg### [at] npqr net> wrote in message news:3e29f965@news.povray.org...
>
> > Remember, there is no infringement without a complaint by an
> > alleged owner and without a formal leglal proceeding followed
> > by a judgement in court.
>
> Any group of persons can say, "You can only upload things on my server on
> the condition that it doesn't even make me think about copyright issues."
> They have the right to say keep the rubbish off my server. You don't have
> the right to say, Take it unless You're sued or I'll sue you.
>
What does getting sued have to do with anything?
An accusation has been made by one person who hasn't checked any
facts that an IRTC entrant's` work should be voted <1,1,1> by every
voter.
As explained elsewhere the admin team had minimal exposure here.
What is important is dealing with what may very well be a violation
of the IRTC anim rules.
If there is any foundation for the accusation I will consider re-evaluating
my vote.
Show me some facts - don't expect me to vote the way someone wants
me to based on nothing.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
