Looks good Stephen. I shall have a try at that next week probably (in the
mean time, have to earn money, sigh)
Ok for the adequate/great definition. I totally agree! Still, having a
nicely working plugin is... nice! But one is never finished, I guess.
 Thanks!!

Thomas

"StephenS" <ssh### [at] echelonca> schreef in bericht
news:3e20a27f$1@news.povray.org...
>
> "Thomas de Groot" <t.d### [at] internlnet> wrote in message
> news:3e16ec66@news.povray.org...
> > Yes, this is a nice solution. Especially with the inversed comment
signs!!
> > However, in view of the down side you mention, I think I prefer to
include
> > the incs myself (in the include section of Moray) whenever I use the
> > isosurface plugin. Which is a great plugin, by the way!
> >
> > Thomas
>
> I can't take any credit. I had no idea of this until someone else listed
> this as a solution to a problem.
>
> An alternate solution is to include this in one of the declare statements:
>    XX=0; #include "functions.inc" #declare XX=0
> This will be exported to povray as
>   #declare XX=0; #include "functions.inc" #declare XX=0 ;
> It is my understanding (please correct me if I'm wrong) that if you use
> Moray's include section, only full path names are used.
> Example:
> #include "C:\Program Files\POV-Ray for Windows v3.5\include\functions.inc"
> If you share your Moray files with others, they will need to adjust the
path
> name if different. For me this is only a minor annoyance, you would have
to
> decide for yourself.
> Perhaps if I update the plugin at some time, I should add a section for
> #include, in a similar way I do for #declare.
>
> Thank you for your kind words, but I think it's only an adequate plugin, a
> great plugin would have a better wire frame :-)
>
> Stephen
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message