Ben T. Scheele <sch### [at] tcumnedu> wrote in message
news:3e1d24c8@news.povray.org...
>     Since it seems that post-processed images are acceptable here, I am
> submitting this to the group.  I rendered this as an animation earlier,
and
> today I was looking through older files that I could rerender and print
out
> to fill some old frames I had received.  I wanted to rotate the image to
> make it fit the frame, and just tweak the contrast a bit, but like usual I
> got carried away with enhancing it.  So what do others think about
> post-processing ( and these images )?  I personally wouldn't want to
bother
> with trying to get it perfect in Pov if its so easy to fix up in an image
> editing program.  It is a dilemma though because I want to prepare my
images
> for my webpage, but I also want to present things that were made only with
> Pov-Ray.  Oh well.  I posted the original image as well, although resized
> from 1400*1400.  It took about three hours to render with photons, spacing
> .0035 and without radiosity on an Athlon 1.5 ghz with 512 mb of ddr ram.
>
> -Ben Scheele
>
>
>

i can't really tell whats been post processed. i'd might buy it as straight
up pov if you told me so. Hehe, I just noticed the original is also
attached.

Maybe just change the background color to that blueish grey and turn on
radiosity? that might get a similar effect.

Or does radiosity not pick up on the background color?

Post a reply to this message