Of course I was referring to how the "cut" was made. Not the whole image..
;)
Personally I have nothing against post-processing..
It's just that I find the image a bit blurred in that region. That's why I
was
curious if the image is a result of two other images and PS:d together.

/Stefan
--

"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> skrev i meddelandet
news:3e18321f@news.povray.org...
> Surely that's just showing the cut through the leg in front?
> If it was photoshopped I would think it would look perfect!
>
> --
> Tek
> http://www.evilsuperbrain.com
>
>
> Stefan Persson <azy### [at] teliacom> wrote in message
> news:3e182fdf@news.povray.org...
> > I think the anti-aliasing around the "cut" looks a bit wierd.
Photoshopped?
> > Im just curious.
> >
> > /Stefan
> >
> > --
> > __________________________________________________________
> >
> > "People demand freedom of speech to make up for the
> > freedom of thought which they avoid."
> > - Soren Aabye Kierkegaard (1813-1855)
> >
> > "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human
> > stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
> > - Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
> >
> > No animals were harmed during the production of this mail.
> >

> > __________________________________________________________
> >
> > "Ib Rasmussen" <ib### [at] ibrasdk> skrev i meddelandet
> > news:3E1### [at] ibrasdk...
> > > I think somebody has cut a bit out of the front "leg" af your square.
> > > Better repair it before people see it, and thinks something is wrong
> > > with your model. :)
> > >
> > > /Ib
> > >
> > > Kzerphii Toomk wrote:
> > >
> > > > Only raytracing, but easy to understand how it's wrong...
> > > >
> > > > KT (France)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Post a reply to this message