I think that's a good idea! And I have another idea: I could easily convert
the floor part into a piece of perl-script that write a (huge?) include file
that parses faster than this extremely nested set of macros.


"Rick [Kitty5]" <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote in message
news:3df0ad53@news.povray.org...
> Apache wrote:
> > Tiles will be smaller (twice as small <--> tilesurface *= .25 <-->
> > amount of tiles *= 4), but then the parsing process will need lots of
> > time.
>
> Why not render a section of tiles from above and use the resulting render
as
> an image map & bump map, i think as your making them smaller anyhow you
wont
> notice the difference
>
> if you not 100% happy with the results you can always swap back to csg
floor
> for the final render
>
>
> --
>
> Rick
>
> Kitty5 NewMedia http://Kitty5.co.uk
> POV-Ray News & Resources http://Povray.co.uk
> TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037
>
> PGP Public Key
> http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.426 / Virus Database: 239 - Release Date: 02/12/2002
>
>

Post a reply to this message