|
 |
Warp wrote:
> normdoering <nor### [at] yahoo com> wrote:
>> Is there a way you could make height fields more flexible?
>
> Please see the section 7.13.1.1 of the POV-Ray 3.5 documentation.
>
>> Don't tell me a height field isn't a wireframe internally...
>
> You talked about isosurfaces. Heightfields have nothing to do with that.
>
Well, height_fields indeed don't have anything to do with isosurfaces, but
height fields in general do: a function of form y - my_height_func(x,0,z)
produces one. And of course an isosurface height field is much more
flexible than a traditional one.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
