Tim Nikias wrote:

> But if we make those parts slightly overlapping? 

Yes, that should work. Of course, then there'll actually be _more_ 
coincident surfaces (on the sides), but if the objects have the same 
texture (which they do have in our case) this shouldn't be a problem. And 
anyway, if the parts overlap only very slightly, it wouldn't even be 
visible.

> It seems that its not THAT important anyhow, lets just 
> stick to union{} for non-transparent objects and breaking 
> the CSG in parts then.

Yep.


-Johannes

Post a reply to this message