Sorry forgot to change my settings in OE buk### [at] alltelnet will get here.
"Dave Blandston" <gra### [at] earthlinknet> wrote in message
news:3d9f8a9c$1@news.povray.org...
> > Well, as soon as the first frame is done, I'll send it over,
> > and you can check.
> Sounds good - That should solve the mystery.
>
> > And regarding the speedy computer:
> > 1.4 GHZ Athlon, Win98, 512 MB RAM
> >
> > What's yours?
> A 700 MHz Athlon (it was considered fast when it was new...), only 128 MB
> RAM. But when I started using POV v1.0, I had a 20 MHz 386 with no math
> co-processor, so I guess I shouldn't complain...
>
> --
> -David
>
> "Tim Nikias" <tim### [at] gmxde> wrote in message
> news:3d9f7dc5@news.povray.org...
> > AFAIK, POV assumes a display_gamma of 2.2,
> > which I have set (cause it is the correct value for my
> > screen), and when using assumed_gamma, correction
> > is applied.
> >
> > Reading the docs I came to the conclusion that
> > not specifying an assumed_gamma, all images should
> > be the same, as no correction is applied, no matter
> > the display_gamma I set...
> >
> > --
> > Tim Nikias
> > Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
> > Email: Tim### [at] gmxde
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message