AFAIK, POV assumes a display_gamma of 2.2,
which I have set (cause it is the correct value for my
screen), and when using assumed_gamma, correction
is applied.

Reading the docs I came to the conclusion that
not specifying an assumed_gamma, all images should
be the same, as no correction is applied, no matter
the display_gamma I set...

Well, as soon as the first frame is done, I'll send it over,
and you can check.

And regarding the speedy computer:
1.4 GHZ Athlon, Win98, 512 MB RAM

What's yours?

--
Tim Nikias
Homepage: http://www.digitaltwilight.de/no_lights/index.html
Email: Tim### [at] gmxde

> > And then I've noticed that you haven't set a gamma in
> > the ini-file, and no assumed_gamma in the global-settings.
> Good point, Tim. If I understand correctly (and I'm not sure I do...), not
> setting the gamma results in no gamma correction, which means the images
may
> not look right on everyone else's monitors, but the final animation will
be
> consistent. Whereas, if the scene or ini file did contain gamma settings,
> the files produced on other computers would not be the same as if my
> computer had rendered them, and although the individual frames would like
> right on that person's computer, the final animation would not look right.
> Is that correct, or am I misunderstanding how gamma correction works?
>
> > I sure hope that this doesn't mean the frames won't
> > fit together in the end...
> Me too!
>
> > Hm. I've just watched the Toy Story DVD, so 2 hours
> > of rendering time set to lowest priority resulted in
> > half an image.
> You have a pretty speedy computer!
>
> Regards,
> -David
>
>

Post a reply to this message