Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
>>   I also disagree with the idea that a compiler should not issue any
>> warnings about code which is correct according to the C++ syntax definition.

> Well, if you don't read carefully you will of course continue to miss that I
> am complaining about the default warnings.  Not about being able to enable
> other warnings.  In fact, I made this clear early in this thread.

  Ok, I can admit this misunderstanding. However, it would be easier if
it was the *only* thing that you claimed. What I don't like is that you
call the compiler "broken" just because it has a default warning set which
you think should not be default, but behind a higher warning level option.

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -

Post a reply to this message