In article <dbdgpu4mk28f04fs4g645r9mpgf49seddc@4ax.com> , ABX 
<abx### [at] abxartpl>  wrote:

> I still wonder it is correct to use
> implementation dependand features.

Well, unless you don't want to use any POD types you will have to.  As you
know, the precision of ints, floats, doubles, or even if chars are signed or
unsigned by default is implementation defined as well.  Just like many other
things.  Otherwise C/C++ would not be such powerful languages and we would
still be writing device drivers in assembler - not that that would always be
a bad thing, but still ;-)

    Thorsten

____________________________________________________
Thorsten Froehlich, Duisburg, Germany
e-mail: tho### [at] trfde

Visit POV-Ray on the web: http://mac.povray.org

Post a reply to this message