|
 |
Yes, if they'd take it.
In thinking more about my calcs, I'm purely confident the volume fraction
calc is based on correct metallographic principles. This calc, however, of
the mpd is based on a 2-d measurement, and the 2d measurement doesn't
exactly represent the 3d. So please don't use these results for any legal
work or building a bridge on which human beings will have to travel for the
time being...
I also would think that I'm not finished until I can find a
"metallographic", quantitative, difference between NG2 and NG3. I know
that mountains "look different," but not what makes them different. (Don't
say 1/f noise or I'll yawn and shrug my shoulders as to what the heck you're
saying).
"William F. Pokorny" <pok### [at] attglobal net> wrote in message
news:3D734F23.8215AC5C@attglobal.net...
> Greg, Have you thought about donating your findings to the documentation
> shipped with Pov-Ray ? Bill P.
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
