Wow - I'll try applying that formula to the lambda variable, since that
seems to produce the best results...
--
-David

"Thies Heidecke" <h3i### [at] gmxnet> wrote in message
news:3d69fdf0@news.povray.org...
> Even better is:
>
> (1-clock)*bumps(x+clock  ,y+clock  ,z+clock  )+
>    clock *bumps(x+clock-1,y+clock-1,z+clock-1)
>
>
> Greetings,
> Thies

Post a reply to this message