Christoph Hormann wrote:
> - what's described in
>
http://www.students.tut.fi/~warp/povQandT/languageQandT.html#blurredreflection
> is probably a better way for achieving realistic reflection blur.
Hmmmm... I'm not that sure. You mean perhaps that it is much more easy to
setup and (somewhat) faster. But I tried both methods and can't still
decide wich one produces "more realistic" results.
Rafal aproach is not that bad, but I found that it works better with
focal_blur than with aa. I also prefer the cells patern for this technique,
as it seems to give the most smooth results. Here is a sample with 192
blur_samples (damn slow):
http://www.ignorancia.org/images/microcells08-192bs.jpg
and the same scene without "micro-normals":
http://www.ignorancia.org/images/micro-no_brush.jpg
--
Jaime Vives Piqueres
La Persistencia de la Ignorancia
http://www.ignorancia.org
Post a reply to this message
|