Micha Riser <mri### [at] gmxnet> wrote:
> An alternative is to render the picture 4x bigger with normal AA 
> settings and scale it down in a graphic program.

  How that's different from using antialiasing method 1 with threshold 0
and four samples per pixel?
  (Method 2 will give you a better result anyways.)

-- 
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -

Post a reply to this message