|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Txemi Jendrix wrote:
> I've been one day thinking about it, and I can't find something that
> "can't" be done with Hamapatch. Sorry.
No worries...
> But what?. The models I do are not extremily difficult (actually are very
> easy)
> nor time comsuming (you can work very quickly with hamapatch).
That might tend to explain your level of happiness with Hamapatch. If I was
only interested in making "very easy" models, I'm sure Hamapatch would work
just fine... or even Moray, for that matter.
> I fear that you know about Hamapatch more or less what I know about
> Rhino...
Perhaps. Both are sitting here on my HD, and when they're both open at the
same time comparison seems a bit.... unfair. I never meant to give the
impression that I somehow dislike Hamapatch. As software that can be
freely downloaded and used, it rocks. Placed next to a commercial product
such as Rhino, however, it's usefulness dims to obscurity.
> Bye
http://www.google.com
knock yerself out :-p
Iborg
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |