Warp wrote:
> But at least they are consistent, logical
> and mathematically correct.

This was not the issue in question. You was talking about the simplicity
of the macro. The issue of the mathematical correctness has already been
discussed, where Karl pointed out that it would be useful nonetheless.
That was the point where you swithed the subject to the issue of the
simplicity, which I responded to in my last post. Now you switched the
subject back again, and we could go on like this forever.

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World:  http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated May 20)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring:  http://webring.povray.co.uk

Post a reply to this message