Rune <run### [at] mobilixnetdk> wrote:
> I'm not for or against such a macro, but I do know that there are some
> of the macros in the standard include files that are way simpler and IMO
> ridiculous than this proposed one.

  But at least they are consistent, logical and mathematically correct.

-- 
#macro N(D)#if(D>99)cylinder{M()#local D=div(D,104);M().5,2pigment{rgb M()}}
N(D)#end#end#macro M()<mod(D,13)-6mod(div(D,13)8)-3,10>#end blob{
N(11117333955)N(4254934330)N(3900569407)N(7382340)N(3358)N(970)}//  - Warp -

Post a reply to this message