Warp wrote:
>   Such macro is so extremely simple that I don't see
> any good reason for including it in the standard
> include files.

I'm not for or against such a macro, but I do know that there are some
of the macros in the standard include files that are way simpler and IMO
ridiculous than this proposed one.

Two examples from math.inc:

// Squares the components of a vector
#macro VSqr(V) (V*V) #end

// Distance between V1 and V2
#macro VDist(V1, V2) vlength(V1 - V2) #end

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World:  http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated May 20)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring:  http://webring.povray.co.uk

Post a reply to this message