"Hugo" <hua### [at] post3teledk> wrote in message
news:3d03b727$1@news.povray.org...
> I prefer the one without noise. Because noise is a temporary problem of
> real-life cameras that will soon be long gone. But photos will still look
> realistic. So a realistic raytracing shouldn't depend upon tricks like
this.
> It's even possible a noisy picture will be "irritating" for people in the
> future. Though we think it's an enhancing effect.

True, very true! Though, minimizing noise isn't the same as eliminating it.
We've been able to diminish noise successfully, but I'm not sure how much
time will have to pass before we can say the noise is low enough to be
undetectable.

Let's hope we'll converge rapidly to that goal :)

Fernando.

Post a reply to this message