Rune <run### [at] mobilixnetdk> wrote:
> Here's the same animation but with 6000 particles instead of 1200. On
> my Athlon XP 1700 the last frame took 10 seconds to parse and the
> total parse time for the 120 frames were 20 minutes. (Note to self:
There's
> somthing wrong. This means that all the frames took 10 seconds to
> parse each, but the first frames should be much faster because of the
> fewer active particles. Something to investigate.)

looks mcuh better, especially the first 'splash', how about an over nighter
with 120000 :P


--
Rick

Kitty5 WebDesign - http://Kitty5.com
POV-Ray News & Resources - http://Povray.co.uk
TEL : +44 (01270) 501101 - FAX : +44 (01270) 251105 - ICQ : 15776037

PGP Public Key
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x231E1CEA

Post a reply to this message