|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Granted I love those Paperweights.. and I think the caustics are nice.. Just
a little over done.. :)
Over all it's a GREAT picture.. those weights are just impressive.. you
should post the scene file for one of those little buggers. :)
"Harold Baize" <bai### [at] itsa ucsf edu> wrote in message
news:3ce54b9f$1@news.povray.org...
>
> True, I didn't take the time to match the sky with
> the virutal sun placement. The clouds are a
> photograph and the sun would actually be
> coming from behind the camera, not to
> the left in front, but I wanted to see the caustics.
> I'm just learning caustics, maybe I should have
> shot fewer photons? Still, I like the realism in
> the paperweights, maybe I'll spend some
> time and finish a more complete and acturate
> environment.
>
> HB
>
> "Dave Bates" <dab### [at] msn com> wrote in message
> news:3ce54792$1@news.povray.org...
> > Harold,
> > that's neat I like that.. And I think I've figured out photons as
> well.
> > My question, don't the Caustics seem a little extreme..
> > I mean behind the scene it seems to be a cloudy day, but the
Caustics
> > from the paperweights act like it's extremly sunny..
> >
> > Maybe I'm missing something here.. :)
> > "Harold Baize" <bai### [at] itsa ucsf edu> wrote in message
> > news:3ce5395b@news.povray.org...
> > >
> > > Took Thomas Lake's advice and ran it with photons. This version
> > > has radiosity, dispersion, and caustics. The Pentium 4 1.4Ghz
> > > machine was down to 3 PPS :-)
> > >
> > > Harold
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |