Warp wrote:
>   And that surprises you?
>   When we go to the extremes, floating point accuracy errors usually
>   give
> funny results.

At exactly 2^31?

>   Why do you think that any part of turbulence calculations use ints?
>   AFAIK
> it's all floating point.

Because this is a limit typical for int.
-- 
Felix Wiemann

Post a reply to this message