|
 |
TigerHawk <tig### [at] stic net> wrote:
> Dude chill out, the world doesn't revolve around Emacs...
But why make something that is already done (and better)?
> For example, while taking notes for CS I
> prefer to use jed because it's smaller
Who cares? In modern computers the size of emacs is nothing.
> faster
Faster in what way?
If I press a key, the correspondent letter appears immediately on the
window. That's fast enough.
I don't consider speed to be a reason to switch to another editor which
has a lot less features.
> and does many of the same things I need it to do.
That's the point: It does "many", not "all".
I personally am not prepared to change editor to a "smaller" and "faster"
one if it means I will be losing features I use.
> Let's
> face it, Emacs is a dusty old dinosaur
Why all programs which have existed for long time are "old dinosaurs"?
The current version of emacs is pretty different from the first emacs
which existed. I wouldn't call it "old".
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
|
