"Christopher James Huff" <chr### [at] maccom> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:chr### [at] netplexaussieorg...
> In article <3ca8ce46@news.povray.org>, "Jan Walzer" <jan### [at] lzernet>
> wrote:
>
> > <theoretically>
> > probably for an infinite number of samples/pixel (+some jitter) could
> > remove moire ...
> > </theoretically>
>
> I don't think so. [....]  Sampling each pixel with a spherical
> distribution instead of a flat square distribution helped some.

Hence I added the "+some jitter"-part ... I assumed the jitter to
be spherical ...

OTOH: Even if, it would produce an blurred image, probably a rectangular
jitter, spanning over 3x3 pixels should suffice, to avoid moire ...

The image will loose sharpness, but moire should be gone (for infinite
number of samples)

Post a reply to this message