|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Chris Becker <cmb### [at] rit edu> wrote:
> So what's the big deal of actually modifying POV-Ray with a new AA method?
Nothing.
> AA shoots multiple rays for a single pixel which is then averaged. How is
> that different than just taking a higher rendering of the image and
> averaging the pixels?
It's different because the latter method is post-processing. It's not
something the renderer itself supports, but has to be done with a paint
program.
> Why is it such a big deal to modify the renderer?
It isn't.
> Megapov does post processing and I don't see such huge debates about that...
Because it's the renderer itself which does it.
The idea is to participate with the output image of a renderer, not a
rendered image which has been enhanced with another program afterwards.
The IRTC rules prohibit post-processing for this reason.
--
#macro M(A,N,D,L)plane{-z,-9pigment{mandel L*9translate N color_map{[0rgb x]
[1rgb 9]}scale<D,D*3D>*1e3}rotate y*A*8}#end M(-3<1.206434.28623>70,7)M(
-1<.7438.1795>1,20)M(1<.77595.13699>30,20)M(3<.75923.07145>80,99)// - Warp -
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |