"Christoph Hormann" wrote:
> I think the foreground is not so good in this version.
> You might try using a separate higher resolution
> heightfield for it.

Maybe...

> using such strong and large scale normals is always
> problematic.

I'm not using very strong or large scale normals IMO.

> Using the same pattern for the texture as for the
> heightfield might be useful.

Wouldn't that just give identical results as if I used a gradient y pattern?

> You could make the lower parts more sandy while having
> the higher parts made of stone material.

Or the flatter parts more sandy. So far it was supposed to look like rock
everywhere, but I'll give a combined sand and rock look a try.

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World:  http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring:  http://webring.povray.co.uk

Post a reply to this message