|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Corey Woodworth" wrote:
> I like the banding a lot better in this one, It
> might even looik better with a 3rd color added
> for more variation, but I'm not sure if thats
> realsitic or not, just a guess :)
I think it does occur in reality. But adding support for that would require
me to change the way my textures work, so I'm not sure about that. Maybe...
> I liked the 2nd's normal the best but this one fits
> better, maybe if you lowered its height or depth
> (whatever its called) it might look like a better
> combination between sand and rock.
It's not currently supposed to look like sand. Would there be sand in a
landscape like this? I'm in need of reference photos...
> One thing that has beugged me about all 3 pics is
> the mountainthings in the middle. The ones on the
> sides look awsome but the ones in the middle look
> TOO bumpy.
I'll see what I can do...
> Can't wait to see the next one!
Glad you like it. :)
Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Feb 16)
POV-Ray Users: http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Ring: http://webring.povray.co.uk
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |