"Christopher James Huff" <chr### [at] maccom> wrote
> I don't think the mere presence of a preprocessor is a flaw in a
> language. And in this case, it is rather unavoidable...unless you want
> to re-evaluate the entire scene for each ray cast.

Using functions instead of some macros is effectively the replacement of
preprocessor features with the language features. Does this lead to
re-evaluation of entire scene for each ray cast?

Of course, some things must be 'const'... But even this requirement can be
lifted if an object is to be used solely in the 'object' pattern, right?

Post a reply to this message