"Thomas Lake" <tla### [at] REMOVE-THISshawca> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3c7dffaf$1@news.povray.org...
> Why is the DivX 4 times longer, and slower, than the Mpeg? Did you do this
> to save space?
Both animations consist of 120 frames but the divx plays at 10fps
and the mpeg at 29.97fps because Videomach says that mpeg is
limited to that framerate.

> I like the animation
Thanks

> but frankly I can't think of many uses
> for this as long as the shapes have as many artefacts as they do now.
yeah, i know what you mean. The artifacts can be compensated with more
harmonics. In fact you can have as much details as you want, but it's
computationally expensive. Moreover these were extreme shapes and i
hope it will look better with more similar objects. I will post a new
animation when the analyzer-macro is done

Greetings
    Thies Heidecke

Post a reply to this message