Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:3c75fe70@news.povray.org...
>   Why have an unfinished internal implementation with a lot to be desired
> when there are excellent spline include files out there which support the
> same features and a lot more, and are even easier to use?

Because I can accelerate and decelerate (or not) across the spline the way
that I want to.
Because I really like the form of the natural spline (this may be  part of
the includes you mentioned.)

 -Shay

Post a reply to this message