Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote in message
news:3c7532ea@news.povray.org...
> In fact, I think the current implementation is flawed as it ignores
everything
> else in POV-Ray.  If catmull-rom splines cannot be added to 3.5 in time
the
> whole spline thingy should be dropped as the current implementation would
only
> cause needless confusion and conflict with everything else in POV-Ray.

Please do not do that!
Also, please just rename and not remove the current spline function used in
spline declaration. The ends might not line up as nicely as others, but the
even curve that it produces is very nice.

 -Shay

Post a reply to this message