"Tim Nikias" wrote:
> It does look really good, but by what I've seen
> your particle-system do before, I was rather disappointed.

Hmm. I had worked out a system with discs where I was actually under the
impression that I wouldn't have been able to tell the difference myself,
apart from the shadows and the places where the particles are intersecting
with objects. But everyone have very quickly spotted the shortcomings of the
system... I wonder if I had used a non-moving camera if it would have been
as easy to tell?

> As others have mentioned already, it looks
> 3D-Game-esque, not POV-RAY.

Apard from the shadows, I'd like to know how to make the fire and smoke look
better if anyone have any hints. As i said, I've worked on it for a long
time and am kind of unable to see if it looks wrong, and why.

> And you post an animation just as I'm about to take the
> next two non-computer weeks to work through a printed
> version of my Particle-System

A printed version of your particle system??? I have no idea what you're
talking about... :)

> and finally get it finished, now that my IRTC-Entry
> (my first!) has been sent in...

Good luck with both!

> See ya, and I'll just hope you'll post a media-version
> in a few days (hey, you've got two weeks, then I'll be
> back!) ;-)

Well, I have reasons not to work on a media version right now. Basically, it
will delay the release of my system. I just wanted to have *some* kind of
explosion included in the first version of the package. :)

Rune
--
3D images and anims, include files, tutorials and more:
Rune's World:    http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk (updated Jan 20)
POV-Ray Users:   http://rsj.mobilixnet.dk/povrayusers/
POV-Ray Webring: http://webring.povray.co.uk

Post a reply to this message